Friday, December 18, 2009
"When you come to think of it, almost all human behavior and activity is not essentially any different from animal behavior. The most advanced technologies and craftsmanship bring us, at best, up to the super-chimpanzee level. Actually, the gap between, say, Plato or Nietzsche and the average human is greater than the gap between that chimpanzee and the average human. The realm of the real spirit, the true artist, the saint, the philosopher, is rarely achieved. Why so few? Why is world history and evolution not stories of progress but rather this endless and futile addition of zeroes. No greater values have developed. Hell, the Greeks 3,000 years ago were just as advanced as we are. So what are these barriers that keep people from reaching anywhere near their real potential? The answer to that can be found in another question, and that's this: Which is the most universal human characteristic - fear or laziness?"
Monday, June 22, 2009
Saturday, March 08, 2008
We have taller buildings, but shorter tempers; Wider freeways, but narrower viewpoints; We spend more, but enjoy less of it.
We have bigger houses and smaller families; More conveniences, but less time. We have more degrees, but less sense; More knowledge, but less judgment; More experts, but less solutions; More medicine, but less wellness;
We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values. We talk too much, love too seldom, and hate too often.
We have learned to make a living, but not a life. We have added years to life, but not life to years.
We have been all the way to the moon and back, but have trouble crossing the street to meet a new neighbor. We have conquered outer space, but not inner space. We have cleaned up the air, but polluted the soul. We have split the atom, but not our prejudice.
We have higher incomes, but lower morals. We have become long on quantity, but short on quality.
These are the times of tall men, and short character; Steep profits, and shallow relationships. These are the times of world peace, but domestic warfare; More leisure, but less fun; More kinds of food, but less nutrition.
These are days of two incomes, but more divorce; Of fancier houses, but broken homes.
It is a time when there is much in the show window and nothing in the stockroom; A time when technology can bring this letter to you, and a time when you can choose either to forward the message and make a difference… Or just hit, "Delete."
Saturday, March 31, 2007
Monday, December 18, 2006
Sight
Primary: View
Secondary: Creating
Smell
Primary: Scent
Secondary: Intuition
Taste
Primary: Flavor
Secondary: Pleasure
Hearing
Primary: Sound
Secondary: Judgement
Touch
Primary: Contact
Secondary: Relaxation
Thursday, November 30, 2006
Saturday, September 23, 2006
Consider today's known universe contains at least a hundred-billion galaxies each containing an average of a hundred-billion stars. Now consider the mind-boggling number of electrons, protons, neutrons, and all other matter-and-energy particles in those stars, planets, dark matter as well as all additional particles scattered throughout space. That number would equal 10^86 particles, a number still considerably less than a googol. Now, if our entire universe of about fifteen billion light years across were packed solid with subatomic particles with zero space between them, the number of particles would rise to 10^130.
But, how large is a googolplex, 10^(10^100)? Just to print the number of zeroes after the number 1 would require enough paper to pack solid our entire universe, fifteen billion light years across. And a super googolplex is a googolplex that is raised to an additional 100th power. No scale is available for any conscious mind on Earth to grasp such a number.
Take a ride to the small: Slice an average-sized pie in half ninety-one times. On the ninety-second slice, you would need to slice the nucleus of an atom in half. How small is the nucleus of an atom? Enlarge a baseball to the size of Earth. One would then see the atoms of that baseball as the size of cherries filling the entire planet. Now, enlarge one of those atoms to the size of the Astrodome. The nucleus would then become visible as the size of a grain of sand.
What about the smallest or shortest unit of time that the human mind can grasp: Planck's time of 10^-42 of a second -- about the time required for light travelling at 186,281 miles per second to traverse the diameter of the smallest subatomic particle of, say, a 2x10^-33 centimeter diameter, which is Planck's length. A time less than 10^-42 of a second measured from the theoretical beginning of time in our universe cannot be experimentally simulated or conceptually grasped.
Finally, grasping the smallest and the biggest in terms of eternity requires the axiomatic fact that EXISTENCE EXISTS. Thus, existence has no prior causes and is eternal. Relative to eternity, the smallest unit and the largest unit are equal in occurance, time, or distance. For example, compare an incredibly fast event that occurs once every 10^-42 of a second to an incredibly slow event that occurs once every super googolplex years. The occurrence of those events are equal in eternity. For, both of those events have occured and will occur an infinite number of times in eternity.
Thursday, April 27, 2006
Saturday, January 21, 2006
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
What If...
What if we could manipulate physics?
What if everywhere had seasonal light and darkness like the poles?
What if the only way to die was to choose to?
Monday, May 09, 2005
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Saturday, April 16, 2005
Saturday, April 02, 2005
Monday, February 28, 2005
The Ongoing List of the Best Things About Life
Monday, February 21, 2005
The distance from Earth to the next closest star would equal a stack of paper 71 feet high.
The diameter of our galaxy would equal a stack 310 miles high.
The distance to the next closest galaxy would equal a stack 6000 miles high.
The distance to the edge of the known universe would equal a stack 31 million miles high or about 1/3 of the distance to the sun.